The legendary North Carolina
oval – site of some of NASCAR’s most memorable moments -- has been inactive
since April of 2013, when it hosted a NASCAR Camping World Truck Series event.
Since, then, the track has laid silent, floundering under a delinquent, $4.2
million mortgage, rumored ownership squabbles and a series of encouraging
rumors that never quite seem to come true.
Now, a new round of
announcements has raised hopes that the track known as “The Rock” might still
arise from the dead. The question is, can any of it be believed?
The new X-Cup Series announced
plans to run a number of events at Rockingham this season, with spokesman James
Martin saying they would "hopefully" hold their first event there in
April of this year. Martin told the Richmond
County (NC) Daily Journal that the organization’s 10-race schedule is
"all gonna be ran at Rockingham," with eight events to be held on the
traditional, 1.017-mile oval track, with the remaining two contested on the
infield road course.
The National Auto Sports
Association also has an event scheduled at Rockingham on July 2-3, and the Super Cup Stock Car Series says it will close its 2016 campaign with a race at Rockingham Speedway on Saturday,
October 15. With a schedule that includes only eight dates – two of which are
listed as “To Be Announced” with another as “Pending” -- the circuit’s
pronouncement seemed shaky, at best. Series spokesman Joe Schmaling did little
to calm those fears today, when asked to discuss his circuit’s scheduled event
at “The Rock.”
His terse reply? “I have
nothing to release at this time.”
Now there’s a
confidence builder.
A dozen announced events seems
like an ambitious schedule for a venue that has not hosted the sound of racing engines
in nearly three years. But Craig Northacker, a U.S. Army veteran who serves as
executive director of Vets-Help.org, said today that he is confident in his
ability to make it happen.
Craig Northacker of Vets-Help.org |
In January of 2015, Northacker
announced plans to purchase Rockingham and convert it into a “Reintegration
Center” for military veterans. At the time, Northacker said auto racing would
be a major part of his organization’s effort to “reintegrate veterans back into society… with stability, financial security
and an affordable home.”
One year later, that plan is apparently still in place, though not much closer to fruition.
“My plan for Rockingham is to create a facility that can serve the needs of our service veterans and their families,” said the Cold Spring Harbor, NY, native, who as a Certified Public Accountant has more than two decades of involvement in the entertainment industry. “We will be rolling out a number of educational, vocational and rehabilitative programs for our service men and women, all bound together by the racing.”
Northacker confirmed that while
he currently holds a three-year lease, he still intends to purchase Rockingham
Speedway, despite difficulty negotiating with the former mortgage holder, Farmers and
Merchants Bank.
“The previous holder of the note made things very, very difficult,” he said. “We wanted to put $50 million into this facility, but (F&M) wouldn’t even talk to us. They made it extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the process to move forward.”
It's been three years since "The Rock" roared. |
Recently, however, F&M sold
the outstanding note to Bill Silas, father of ARCA and NASCAR
Camping World Truck Series driver Brian Silas and co-owner of Rockingham Speedway,
along with former racer Andy Hillenburg. Northacker said the sale of that note
and the subsequent assignment of two deeds of trust and an
assignment of rents and leases to Silas’ BK Rock Holdings, LLC, “cleared the
way” for talks begin once again, in earnest.
“I have been actively talking with
Billy Silas,” said Northacker, “and we have begun to clear some of the road
blocks that stand in our way.”
Silas' attorney, Alan Armour, offered a less-encouraging assessment, saying, "It is my understanding that there are numerous parties who have shown, and continue to express, an interest in Rockingham Raceway, including Craig Northacker. However, to date, it is my understanding that none of the parties have presented any definitive proposals.
"We are aware of numerous parties who desire to bring racing events back to the “Rock," said Armour. "However, there is a lot involved, and until a definitive agreement is reached, there are no assurances that there will be any racing events in year 2016."
While declining to discuss any of the specific issues still facing the speedway, Northacker insisted that Rockingham can – and will – host racing events this season.
“There will be racing at Rockingham in
2016,” he said. “I am the instigator of those recent scheduling
announcements” from the Super
Cup Stock Car, X-Cup and National Auto Sports Association
circuits. In fact, Northacker revealed that he owns the
fledgling X-Cup Series, saying, “That’s ours. We’re starting that up as part of
our plan to revitalize the speedway.”
"We are aware of numerous parties who desire to bring racing events back to the “Rock," said Armour. "However, there is a lot involved, and until a definitive agreement is reached, there are no assurances that there will be any racing events in year 2016."
While declining to discuss any of the specific issues still facing the speedway, Northacker insisted that Rockingham can – and will – host racing events this season.
Admitting that he “knows
nothing about racing, really,” Northacker said he will leave the day-to-day
operations of the circuit in the hands of Martin and others. And while
admitting that considerable work must still be done to make his purchase of
Rockingham a reality, he said he is confident that racing will resume at the
Richmond County complex in April of this year.
“Yes,” he said. “The simple
answer is yes. We will make it happen.”
Can Craig Northacker and Vets-Help.org bring Rockingham back from the brink of death?
But talk is cheap, and after a
year of empty promises, grandiose schemes and absolutely no progress, we’re not
quite ready to bet the farm on them, just yet.
Simply put, it remains to be
seen whether Northacker and company can finally put some actual verbs in their
sentences. After spinning their wheels for the last 12 months, it’s difficult
to believe that anyone – no matter how well-intentioned -- can tiptoe through
Rockingham’s legal and financial minefield in time to pull off an April, 2016
race date.
As race fans, we wish them
luck. But we’ve also learned not to get our hopes up.
Exciting to read about the prospect of any racing at the Rock, but the major issue I see is that the future of the speedway will once again hinge on attendance, and I don't see fans packing the place out to watch one series run several times at the same place. NASCAR's strategy of going only to the speedways that could facilitate a large turnout has really backfired, because those tracks produce boring racing which has driven fans away, therefore creating attendance issues at those facilities as well. If the France administration wasn't so short-sighted, perhaps they'd recognize that the pursuit only of big money isn't necessarily what's good for the health of the sport. The bottom line is how entertaining the races are.
ReplyDeleteThe problems with this analysis remain that boring racing isn't exclusive to the bigger tracks - the objective reality remains Rockingham even in NASCAR's competitive apex (the 1971-84 period) only had decent racing - at its best Rockingham simply never held up competitively with the bigger tracks. Rockingham had become one of the most overrated speedways on the tour and the demographic in the area was already in decline by 1996-7; the idea implicit in analyses sympathetic with Rockingham is that its racing was somehow better and that if it had stayed it would have helped alleviate some of the sport's popularity issues - an idea with zero credibility behind it.
DeleteNASCAR went to the bigger tracks because they are what the true backbone of its major touring series are - the sport's popularity was built on the superspeedway boom of 1959-71, it was NOT built on short ovals. NASCAR was right to drop Rockingham and North Wilkesboro because they were competitively inferior venues and their audiences were no longer credible racing audiences. Rockingham once and for all proved it is no longer a viable racing demographic with Andy Hillinberg reopened it with warm-weather dates and never sold out one race.
Hi Dave - thanks for a well-balanced and fair representation of where things are at. I am putting a public response to the attorney's absurd comments and approach. He rejects the 10,000 veterans who have committed suicide since we tried to get this going to give them hope as diatribe which he dismisses outright. I am available to give you this information if you want it. In fact, it will help everyone understand why there have been so many unwanted delays because of the malfeasance we have continuously encountered.
ReplyDelete