Thursday, February 02, 2012

COMMENTARY: Pandering To The ADD Fan


Daytona International Speedway announced yesterday that as part of a record purse of more than $19 million, the track will pay a $200,000 bonus to the driver who leads lap 100 – the halfway lap -- in this month’s season-opening Daytona 500.

“There is plenty of incentive for drivers to run up front the entire race, but even more so at the halfway point and the last lap of the Daytona 500,” said DIS President Joie Chitwood in a news release announcing the program.” The good news is that the fine folks in Daytona Beach are trying. They’re promoting the heck out of the “Great American Race,” adding what they consider to be spice to the soup, rather than simply clasping their hands and praying for a sold-out grandstand.  

Unfortunately, our friends at DIS have bought into the erroneous belief that NASCAR Sprint Cup Series racing is… well, boring. They’ve begun pandering to a group of race fans demanding that something – anything – bring them to their feet in a screaming fit of euphoric bliss, every minute of every day.

As a whole, our society has been decimated by a mass outbreak of Attention Deficit Disorder. We fast-forward through movies, skipping past those pesky plot points in order to determine “Who Done It” and move on to whatever comes next. We heat our pre-packaged meals in a microwave oven, eating them over the sink because cooking and washing dishes take too long. We eschew old-fashioned conversation in favor of Twitter, dumbing our thoughts down to 140 characters or less in the interest of time.

NASCAR Nation has been particularly hard-hit by this epidemic. Our demand for constant stimulation has become so overwhelming that for many, the Daytona 500 is no longer good enough. Our insistence on instant gratification has rendered us incapable of enjoying the action, strategy and competitiveness of a full, 500-mile race. Incapable of waiting for the actual finish, we now demand a “Halfway Bonus” to spice-up the middle stages of the race and make our favorite driver risk it all for our entertainment pleasure, every single lap.

Last year, Talladega Superspeedway attempted a similar ploy, offering a $100,000 bonus to the driver who created the 100th lead change in October’s Good Sam Club 500. The track’s previous race had produced a record 88 lead changes, breaking the previous mark of 87 set just one race earlier. Track President Grant Lynch – like Daytona’s Chitwood – bought into the “bonus money makes drivers try harder” premise, anteing up a six-figure bonus that resulted in reams of pre-race publicity, but few results on race day.

Talladega’s $100,000 bonus went unclaimed last fall, despite a highly competitive event that tallied 72 lead changes. Why weren’t the drivers beating their brains out trying to run-up the number of lead changes? And more importantly, why did drivers like Jimmie Johnson, Dale Earnhardt, Jr. and Carl Edwards – all of whom had very fast cars and would have been prime contenders to claim that $100,000 bonus – never go to the front until the very end of the race?

The answer is simple. Because no matter how we try, we cannot make the middle matter.

It’s the Daytona 500, not the Daytona 250. This is big-time professional stock car racing, not Youth League soccer, where no score is kept and everyone gets a popsicle after the game. NASCAR races are marathon events, not sprints, and fans incapable of understanding the difference deserve education, not pandering.

If we are no longer capable of enjoying a full, 500-mile event the way our fathers and grandfathers did, maybe it’s time to simply admit defeat. Let’s pull the plug on live, flag-to-flag TV coverage, since people say they’re sleeping through the middle 300 miles anyway. Let’s revert back to the “Good Old Days” when the race was delivered in an easy-to-digest, 30-minute highlight package a week after it took place; showcasing the start, a couple of wrecks and the final 10 laps.

That way, we’ll have more time to devote to the non-stop excitement of our VideoStation 3, where someone’s head is exploding at all times.

25 comments:

  1. If they were to go to the 30 minute synopsis show, they'll lose this fan. Besides, how many bonus programs were there back in the day?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous4:38 PM

      you really had to say that?

      Delete
  2. Anonymous4:07 PM

    What they put in YOUR coffee this morning??
    Maybe it's time for YOU to unplug.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry, I'm not going anywhere. Besides, what would you have left to read?

      Delete
  3. Well put Moody! Getting real tired of people trying to remake NASCAR.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Captneilf4:21 PM

    Just a humble races watcher's thought.

    PARITY!!! Most sports preach and rule trying to establish PARITY. Where does it say life has to be equal and fair?

    I can remember a driver coming from maybe 17 laps down and winning a race. It may have been Rusty Wallace on a short track. Do you think we will ever see something like that again? Not with PARITY.

    Yes, there should be standards but with plenty of room for enterprising mechanics to make their car better than every one else. It is called competition and may the best lady/man win.

    Then maybe we will see good racing all around the track with lots of passing. Racing is the survival of the BEST and fastest.

    Just look at lap times. They are so close. PARITY???

    Competition is the idea of beating the best. If you can't stand the heat stay out of the kitchen. I know an old phase but very telling.

    You can include ride and park in this. I understand it is all about money. Does it make for a good race? NO!!!

    What can be better than a no body showing up at a track and beating all the favorites?

    It would be nice to tell cars apart because of the design and not color or number.

    Give the teams a chance to come up with something new that makes their car better, win the race and give the other teams a real challenge.

    Parity??? UGH!!! Just like the Federal Government!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04 PM

      Parity is fine as long as it's not with the sponsors as far as NASCAR is concerned. If they truly wanted parity they would open up the sponsorship pool to all sponsors instead of stuffing their pockets. Help the teams find funding to be competitive.

      Let AT&T, Verizon, Boost into Sprint Cup. Let Allstate into the Nationwide series. Tear a page out of the Monstery Energy Supercross book where you see RedBull next the Monster and Rockstar on the podium.

      If you want competition open the doors to sponsors who would and could fund competitive racing instead of having 30 underfunded cars competing with NASCAR and 10 funded cars. Let's see tires , cell phones and insurance and gas sponsors adorn the team cars in all series and not the Official Sponsor list on the NASCAR hauler

      Delete
    2. lol, In the interest of Parity, NASCAR has lost the drive for innovation. To quote a previous reply, "Yes, there should be standards but with plenty of room for enterprising mechanics to make their car better than every one else. It is called competition and may the best lady/man win."

      Well, Toyota came out with an engine that SPANKED every motor on the track. Instead of the other, stuck in the mud, "We don't do things that way!" manufacturers re-designing their engines, NASCAR, IN THE INTEREST OF PARITY made teams using Toyota engines use a restrictor plate in order to reduce the MASSIVE (I heard 5- 10 hp. and one 50hp claim) amount of extra horsepower Toyota engines were delivering to the rear wheels.

      And yes, USA engine fans, I would be just as upset had Chevy, Ford or Mopar been made to do the same thing!

      PARITY! BAH HUMBUG!!

      Delete
  5. Dwayne in Memphis4:39 PM

    " We heat our pre-packaged meals in a microwave oven, eating them over the sink because cooking and washing dishes take too long."

    You forgot the part about griping because it takes three and a half minutes to cook.

    The sponsored half-way bonus program went away for a reason. Nobody cared. When somebody gets passed on the last lap, they don't jump out of the car and go running to flag stand to grab the white flag...ever. EVER! Not even Mark Martin at Bristol in 1994. EVER!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous4:44 PM

    I very much agree with you! I get so frustrated with "fans" who say a race was boring because there wasn't enough wrecks or spins or drivers beating on each others doors. It's racing not a demolition derby. Passing and clean side by side racing is great, but too many people don't like to see that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. earl064:47 PM

    The thing is Dave, now that the broadcasters hype the living daylights out of each race beforehand, anything less than a thrill-a-minute seems a disappointment.

    Don't put this exclusively on the fans, NASCAR, FOX, TNT, ESPN, MRN, PRN, et al. share the blame too.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous4:50 PM

    I guess the new fans would've hated David Pearson. You never saw him until the end of a race. This kind of thinking goes with if it isn't broke, fix it until it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous5:52 PM

      Nah. They would love him. Because when Peason talks about his career (or anyone else does) the "riding around" part of the story is over quick and he gets to the good part.

      Delete
  9. anonymous internet genius4:58 PM

    i feel you are spot on daryl. our society has taken the short attention span thing too...oh look a squirrel.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous5:08 PM

    1pt per position per lap. done. no more marathon's. RACE the race.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous5:59 PM

    I thought we wanted to attract new fans. The generation coming up today doesn't know about waiting, that doesn't make their fan dollars worth any less than anyone else's. I think that anything that draws positive attention to the sport is a good thing and I don't understand all the complaining about this. The more people watching, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous7:29 PM

    Maybe NASCAR is concerned with the changes to the car to eliminate the two car draft they run the risk of the drivers single file racing the whole time, and they feel the need to spice things up. Mike

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8:49 PM

    Dave, well said as always. There is no way in you know what that I want to go back to getting a 30 minute recap of a 500 mile/lap race. And I don't get paid a bonus at my job until I COMPLETE my objectives, not at halfway.

    To Captneilf's point, yes, we can claim 'parity' on a lot of this. But you also have to look at the reason that we have parity now. It wasn't that long ago when there were weekly rule changes to rear spoilers, fenders, front valences, grill openings, etc. If you were a Ford fan, Chevy was taking us to the cleaners because they had a performance advantage, and vice versa. Fans bitched, owners bitched, so NASCAR came with the 'common template'. The 'twisted sister' car, as you like to call it developed from that because teams still had some wiggle room. Then came the tragedies of 2000 and 2001 when we lost 4 great racers, and along came the COT. This concept was not only a child of safety first and formost, but also to SAVE TEAMS MONEY, since they would not have to have a specially built car (and back up) for each of the 19 or 20 tracks that we were visiting. So the templates tightened. Remember "FenderGate" at Sonoma with Hendrick, or "WindshieldGate" at was it Talledega last year with MWR? Both were products of pushing the line because NASCAR was forced to drastically improve driver safety, and because the cost of being in the sport was exponentially skyrocketing.

    So yes, we have parity. We have ourselves as fans to blame, we have owners to blame, the the result of which I wouldn't trade for anything. As far as safety had come from the early days of our sport, we still had the tragedies of Irwin Jr., Petty, Roper, Earnhardt, and very nearly Ernie Irvan (twice) and Jerry Nedeau, so I will take parity over the alternative.

    Steve in TX

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous9:05 PM

    You are RIGHT ON Mr. Moody. As always you are correct! just wish you would root for Fords!

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous9:05 PM

    Make the radiator inlet smaller, make the radiator the size of a teacup to prevent two-car drafting and by the way let's make the pop-off blow at 25 lbs. so everyone has to either run in a pack or run single file (which is what is going to happen) and when the drivers do try to draft, the motors they will be a blowing. Throw in a little incentive to get to the front at the middle of the race and you have (thanks Allstate) MAYHEM.

    This isn't what racing is all about. I have never watched a race for the big one, but I have a feeling the guys in the 32-43 positions will be in contention by lap 235.


    Doug from NJ

    ReplyDelete
  16. I tried to read the whole article, but lost focus at about the middle. I think you need to send me some cash if you want me to read the WHOLE thing you write. From now on, just make your point in the last paragraph so I can just read at the end to see how it turned out. Thanks Dave!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous11:51 AM

    This 200 grand thing has so many peoples' undies in a bunch. So what! Some lucky SOB is going to be in the right place at the right time and pocket the cash. Good for them. It's not like we're going to stop the race at lap 100 and go to Victory Lane. Does anyone with at least one rational thought per day think any of the marquis drivers are going to risk the big prize just to lead half way? Come on people sit back, pop the top on a cold one and enjoy the race. Long races on big tracks can get boring in the middle. Its a fact. I almost fell asleep in the grandstands Pocono last year. I knew the race would probably suck, but I love racing and went anyway. Daytona could just as easily drop the 200 K to their bottom line. Kudos to Mr. Chitwood for actully being a "promoter". This sport could use more people like him who aren't afraid to try something they think will improve their show. So what if he's wrong. Somebody loading up with an extra 200 grand in their pocket doesn't seem like much of a downside to me.

    ReplyDelete
  18. d_hawks3:20 PM

    awww lighten up a little... it'll be fun!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Norm D12:46 PM

    I can think of a thirty two race short track series that would be happy to offer up title sponsorship and consumer sampling rights for that kind of money - like the products or hate them, U.S. Tobacco and RJ Reynolds are but two of many companies that knew that short track racing was an integral part of motorsports marketing/activation or whatever the buzz word is, today.

    ReplyDelete