The National Motorsports Appeals Panel today
heard and considered the appeal of a P5 penalty issued on March 31, 2015 to team
owner Richard Childress, driver Ryan Newman, crew chief Lucas Lambert (crew
chief), James Bender (tire technician) and Philip Surgen (race engineer)
relative to NASCAR Sprint Cup Series vehicle #31 at Auto Club Speedway.
The
penalty concerns the following sections in the 2015 NASCAR rule book:
12.1: Actions detrimental to
stock car racing
20.16:
Wheels
and tires
A. Any device, modification, or
procedure to the tire or wheel, including the valve stem hardware, that is used
to release pressure, beyond normal pressure adjustments, from the tire and/or
inner shield, will not be permitted.
20.16.2: Tires
F. Modifications to the tires,
by treatment or any other means, will not be permitted.
12.5.3.5.2:
Minimum P5 Penalty Options (includes all four points below):
A. Loss of 50 championship
driver and owner points, regardless of whether the violation occurred during a
Championship race or not
B. $75,000-$125,000 fine
C. Suspension for the next six
series Championship Races, plus any non-championship races or special events
which might occur during that time period, for the crew chief and any other
team members as determined by NASCAR
D. Probation through the end of
the calendar year for all suspended members, or for a six-month period
following the issuance of the penalty notice if that period spans across two
consecutive seasons.
12.5.3.5.3: P5 Level infractions detected during post-race inspection:
If the infraction is
detected during post-race inspection, then the following penalty elements will
be added to those listed previously in this section:
A. Loss
of an additional 25 Championship driver and owner points; regardless of whether
it was a Championship Race or not
B. Loss of an additional $50,000
The
original penalty assessed included a $125,000 fine ($75,000 for a P5 violation plus
$50,000 for a violation found post-race), six-race suspension and probation
through Dec. 31 to Lambert; six-race suspension and probation through Dec. 31
to both Bender and Surgen; and the loss of 75 (50 plus 25) championship car
owner and 75 (50 plus 25) championship driver points to both Childress and
Newman.
Upon hearing the testimony,
the decisions of the National Motorsports Appeals Panel are:
1. The Appellants violated
the Rule or Rules set forth in the Penalty Notice and it is a P5 level
violation.
2. The Panel amends the
original Penalty levied by NASCAR because there is no written explanation of
what constitutes a post-race inspection. Therefore the Penalty elements added
under Section 12.5.3.5.3. are removed and the Penalty adjusted to:
-Loss of 50 NASCAR Sprint
Cup Series Championship Car Owner points for Richard Childress.
-Loss of 50 NASCAR Sprint
Cup Series Championship Driver points for Ryan Newman.
-$75,000 fine.
Suspended for the next six NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Races, plus
any non-Championship Races or Special Events which might occur during that time
period. Placed on NASCAR probation through Dec. 31 for crew chief Lucas
Lambert.
- Suspended for the next
six NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Races, plus any non-Championship
Races or Special Events which might occur during that time period. Placed
on NASCAR probation through Dec. 31 for Tire Technician James Bender.
-Suspended for the next six
NASCAR Sprint Cup Series Championship Races, plus any non-Championship Races or
Special Events which might occur during that time period. Placed on
NASCAR probation through Dec. 31 for Race Engineer Philip Surgen.
The panel consisted of the
following three individuals:
John Capels: Former president and chairman of the board of the United
States Auto Club. Also won four major open-wheel races as a team manager, the
last with Johnny Rutherford at Michigan in 1986.
Hunter Nickell: Former president of SPEED Channel, now known as NASCAR
television partner FOX Sports 1.
Dale Pinilis: Operator of Bowman Gray Stadium, a quarter-mile track
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, and the longest continuously operating weekly
track in NASCAR.
The
Appellants have the right to appeal today’s decision to the National
Motorsports Final Appeals Officer in accordance with Section 15 of the NASCAR
rule book.
I thought that maybe the tire guy and the engineer went behind RCs' back and did this, but haven't heard of anybody getting fired, so maybe RC did know of and condoned it.
ReplyDelete"because there is no written explanation of what constitutes a post-race inspection."
ReplyDeleteI'm a little confused by this line. "post-race inspection" seems to be simple English, or are they saying that their is not a detailed procedure or something else?